All laws
2026

National Data Management Act

Public databases and data governance.

Read the official law
Freedom of expressionMedium risk
Civic participation & democratic processNo risk
Privacy & data protectionMedium risk

How it affects you.

Your identity records become connected across public services.

National ID, passport, tax, address, birth registration and driving-license databases must connect to a national exchange, with storage in national data centers where deemed expedient. Connected bodies may reuse the data for further purposes.§§30, 32

What it protects

  • Linking databases is intended to improve public-service delivery and coordination.

Where it falls short

  • Linked records make it easier to build detailed profiles across different parts of your life.
  • A breach or misuse of access could expose linked information, while safeguards against unrelated reuse remain limited.
  • The law appears to mandate data localization in Bangladesh.
  • Law enforcement and intelligence agencies can access this information with limited procedural safeguards.

A public body or a company misuses your data.

The data authority can give binding directions to any public or private body. It sits within the Prime Minister’s Office and must follow the government’s policy guidelines.§§8, 27

What it protects

  • You can complain to the data authority when your data rights are violated; it can impose fines up to BDT 2,500,000 and award you compensation.§§42, 44
  • A public employee involved in violating your data rights can face disciplinary action for misconduct.§34

Where it falls short

  • The government shapes its appointments, funding and administration.
  • An accountability mechanism for public bodies by a data regulator that itself is not independent and is part of the government would be ineffective.
  • A fine of BDT 2,500,000 would severely impact small businesses and would be inadequate for large corporations.

A system reliant on future regulations.

The law covers security and interoperability for national digital infrastructure such as the data exchange, and leaves detailed standards to future rules.§§23, 30, 33

What it protects

  • Zero-trust architecture, privacy-preserving principles, auditability and minimization are named in the law.§§2, 33

Where it falls short

  • Incident response, penetration testing, encryption standards and vulnerability disclosure are left undefined or to future regulations.
  • Joining many identity databases raises the stakes of a single compromise.
The law

What the law says.

Analysis

Where the framework falls short.

Builds a state-led data architecture (the NDMA authority, the NRDEX exchange, integrated public databases); concentrates data power

Who decides

Who controls the policy board

Nothing in the law makes the authority independent. It is attached to the Prime Minister’s Office and must follow government policy guidelines, and its policy board, chaired by the prime minister, has 17 ministers, officials and members of parliament and 7 government-nominated members.

17Ministers, officials and members of parliament
7Experts and a civil-society member, chosen by the government

Undefined

An open-ended data category

§31

The government may classify and restrict the exchange of “nationally important / sensitive data.” Open-ended terms and limited review safeguards create uncertainty about how broadly those powers may be used.

“Nationally important”“Sensitive data”

Deferred

Cybersecurity duties left to future rules

Core cybersecurity duties (incident response, pen-testing, encryption, vulnerability disclosure, audits) and data categorization are largely deferred to future rules

Recommendation

Amend and narrow.

Changes to data governance

Executive powers should be narrowed, the authority’s independence strengthened, decentralized models preferred, and section 31 deleted.

How others do it

How other data regulators are structured

Referenced to show different approaches, not as models for adoption.

European Union

General Data Protection Regulation

Supports cross-border enforcement through a structured cooperation and consistency mechanism among supervisory authorities.

Read the text

South Africa

Protection of Personal Information Act 2013

Makes its regulator subject only to the constitution and the law, acting “without fear, favour, or prejudice” and answering to the national assembly.

United Kingdom

Data Protection Act 2018

Requires the regulator to act with complete independence and to report to parliament.

Read the text