All laws
2026

Personal Data Protection Act

Personal data, consent and accountability.

Read the official law
Freedom of expressionNo risk
Civic participation & democratic processNo risk
Privacy & data protectionPositive impactwith gaps

How it affects you.

An organization collects or keeps your information.

Consent is one basis for using your data, but the law also allows use without it for reasons such as a contract, a legal claim, employment and social-protection rights, or protecting life or health.§§5, 7

What it protects

  • You can see your data and who received it, and correct, update or delete it, withdraw consent or object to processing.§§11–13
  • Approved changes and deletions must carry across connected systems.§14
  • Consent must be informed, specific and withdrawable, and the organization must prove it obtained yours properly.§5

Where it falls short

  • Refusing consent does not prohibit every use.
  • Broad alternative grounds and weak operational guidance can make these rights harder to exercise.
  • Deletion needs safeguards where personal data appears in journalism or other public-interest content.

Information about you is exposed in a breach.

The duty to report a breach applies only when significant harm is likely, and only toward the data authority: the law does not require telling the people affected.§20

What it protects

  • A breach likely to cause significant damage must be reported to the data authority.§20

Where it falls short

  • An unclear “significant” threshold leaves room for underreporting.
  • Smaller breaches can still expose people to fraud, identity theft or reputational harm, and limit their chance to protect themselves.

A public authority processes your data without consent.

Your consent is not needed where your data is used for national security, defense, public order or the public interest, crime investigation, a court order, tax evasion or other listed purposes.§24

What it protects

  • An exemption waives consent only: every other rule on handling your data still applies.§24(2)

Where it falls short

  • Broad grounds, weak independent oversight and unclear procedures may let exceptional access become routine.
  • That leaves you less practical control over state use of your data.

Your child uses an app.

Processing a child’s data needs a parent’s or guardian’s consent and must take the child’s rights and interests into account.§9

What it protects

  • Your consent as a parent or guardian is needed before an organization collects or uses your child’s data.§9

Where it falls short

  • The law leaves how parental consent is given to future regulations, and says nothing on verifying it or assessing age.
  • Parental consent can stay valid until 18, with no step for the young adult’s own consent.
The law

What the law says.

Children’s data

§9

Processing children’s data requires parental or guardian consent and regard for the child’s rights and interests.

The breach-reporting duty

§20

A breach must be reported to the data authority only where it is likely to cause significant damage to the people affected.

Analysis

Where the framework falls short.

Bangladesh’s first cross-sectoral data-protection law brings several positive developments, but broad powers are often paired with undefined legal standards and heavy reliance on future regulations.

Too wide

State exemptions

§24

State authorities can rely on undefined grounds such as “national security,” “public interest” and “public order” to use personal data without consent, with no prior approval, which risks normalizing broad state access.

National securityPublic interestPublic order

Too wide

Erasure and freedom of expression

§§12–14

The system-wide erasure right risks being used to remove content. The law lets an organization refuse to delete archival records, and public-interest or historical records the data authority specifies, but it does not name journalism.

Erasure rightPersonal data protection
Content-removal riskExpression and press freedom

Undefined

A reporting threshold left undefined

§20

“Significant” is undefined. Until regulations set the factors, the organization that suffered the breach decides, which invites underreporting.

Deferred

A grace period without a roadmap

§1(3)

The grace period comes with no stated rationale or roadmap, and it defers the data-officer duty that would assist organizations in preparing.

Who decides

Public-sector accountability

The 2026 framework omits the earlier provisions expressly allowing administrative sanctions against government bodies and their personnel. Combined with broad exemptions, this risks an accountability gap. It does not abolish every form of public-sector accountability: the National Data Management Act still allows disciplinary action against public employees.

Recommendation

Amend, not reject.

Substantial amendment, not rejection

Substantial amendment, not rejection, is recommended: clearer statutory drafting, stronger procedural safeguards, and more independent oversight and accountability.

How others do it

Penalties, erasure and breach reporting elsewhere

Referenced to show different approaches, not as models for adoption.

European Union

General Data Protection Regulation

EUR 20,000,000 or 4% of total worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher

Pairs its fines with warnings, reprimands, processing bans, suspension orders and compliance directives.

Read the text

European Union (court)

Google Spain v AEPD and Costeja González

Settled on lowering results in search rankings rather than deleting the underlying content.

Read the text

Brazil

General Law on the Protection of Personal Data 2019

Caps fines at 2% of Brazil revenue, up to R$50,000,000 per infringement, alongside blocking, deletion and partial suspension orders.

Read the text
Breach-reporting thresholds, from the lowest threshold to the highest
  1. European Union

    Every breach, unless unlikely to put rights at risk

    Read the text
  2. Singapore

    Likely significant harm, or 500 or more people affected

    Read the text
  3. Australia

    Likely “serious harm,” with guidance on objective factors

    Read the text
  4. Bangladesh

    Likely “significant” damage, a term left undefined